Solution for Case Study:

Explanation given by Mr.Peter was that he explained Jill about the difference between Jack's designation and Jill's designation and that is the difference between Jack's nature of work and Jill's nature of work.

He explained Jill that Jack's nature of work is to interact with people always and move around increasing her contacts as her designation demands it because she is into Human Resource Management.
people into HR have to maintain contacts and always move around identifying the difficulties employees are facing and solve them to make them comfortable in the Organization.

In the same process she must have interacted with the security guard and that is why the security guard knows her well and so she is famous among employees and people around.

In board meetings her points are well valid because the points she raises in the meeting must be in consideration with employees issues and that is why they are notes and valued properly.

Whereas Jill's nature of work demands him to keep things private and confidential and also to avoid much interaction with people because he is into Finance department that is why less people identify him and in board meetings he must have approached only once or twice with his points and not tried further to make them important, that is why his points are not well observed or considered.

With this explanation Jill understands the whole concept and gets satisfied and decides not to resign the Organization.
After the meeting with his Chairman Mr.Peter he runs back to meet Jack apologizes and speaks to her normally as before and all the issues in his mind were solved and he was happy with the way he was treated and thereafter continued his work and also friendship with Jack as usual.

In this way Chairman Mr.Peter succeeded in retaining one of his best employees from leaving the Organization.

2 comments:

  1. I think both of their nature of work will never be the same. The one works in the HRM should be interactive with people to analyze workers performance and also to identify obstacles within the organization whereas The one works in the finance will always keep every information confidential but everything to be transparent and professionalism to be maintained when approaching issues. Solution they need to be counseled and understand one another.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think both of their nature of work will never be the same. The one works in the HRM should be interactive with people to analyze workers performance and also to identify obstacles within the organization whereas The one works in the finance will always keep every information confidential but everything to be transparent and professionalism to be maintained when approaching issues. Solution they need to be counseled and understand one another.

    ReplyDelete

Do not shuffle an employee into wrong job because they are in suitable Payroll

Is it correct to shuffle employees into wrong job just because they are in suitable Payroll? An Organization growth depends on their empl...